Shrivalli Rashmikaa Bhamidipaty vs Humera Baharmus Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In recent data, Baharmus has shown an ability to win 44.44% of points on their second serve, while Bhamidipaty has registered a slightly higher success rate of 46.98%. This serves as a useful indicator in assessing their potential performance in the upcoming match. Additionally, when it comes to return game stats in the recent form, Baharmus has an edge by winning 58.17% of their opponent’s second serve points, compared to Bhamidipaty’s 56.21%. However, in terms of first serve returns, Bhamidipaty’s performance slightly lags, with a 37.71% success rate against Baharmus’s 41.95%.

An analysis of their past performances reveals Bhamidipaty has a stronger record under pressure, saving 56.33% of breakpoints, while Baharmus has managed to save 49.49% in their recent matches. When assessing overall yearly performance, Bhamidipaty boasts a winning rate of 55.38%, securing 36 victories out of 65 matches, while Baharmus has a 50% win record from 28 matches, with a balance of wins and losses (14 each). This provides a broader perspective on their head-to-head predictions.

Exploring their proficiency on various surfaces, Baharmus shows the best results on clay with a success rate of 55% (17-14), whereas their performance on grass remains suboptimal, with a no-win record. Bhamidipaty also thrives on clay, achieving a higher success rate of 62% (13-8), and has yet to claim a victory on indoor hard courts. Evaluating the level at which these players have been competing in the past year shows that Baharmus and Bhamidipaty have primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K, showcasing almost similar win rates of 52.94% and 53.33%, respectively. This comparison offers insights considering the different competitive environments each player is accustomed to.

Their head-to-head analysis is particularly revealing, as Bhamidipaty has dominated, winning 5 of their 6 encounters against Baharmus. This includes a commanding performance in their last meeting at the W15 Ahmedabad, where Bhamidipaty secured a decisive win in straight sets, 6-1, 6-2. The overall set score between them stands at 10-3 in favor of Bhamidipaty, further reinforcing their head-to-head advantage. Despite these disparities in direct meetings, Baharmus has better odds of taking the deciding set, with a 40% win rate, compared to Bhamidipaty’s 29% when considering all matches over the prior year.

When facing different opponents in the past year, Baharmus has competed against higher-ranked opponents with an average ranking of 265.5, while Bhamidipaty has faced players with an average ranking of 424.12. This stat offers context in evaluating their match preparedness and adaptation to tougher competition levels. Additionally, both display a comparable breakpoint conversion rate in recent form, with Baharmus converting 53.51% of opportunities and Bhamidipaty 53.78%, indicating a closely matched competitiveness in seizing pivotal in-game moments.

Assessing these detailed stats leads to a forecast in favor of Bhamidipaty for the upcoming match. Their historical head-to-head success, stronger breakpoint defense, and overall superior win percentage lend them the statistical edge heading into this matchup.